高级检索

    不同制氢方法对电转甲烷能效与经济性的影响

    Impact of different hydrogen production methods on energy efficiency and economics of Power-to-Methane

    • 摘要: 电转甲烷技术具备多重优势,包括减少CO2排放、储存不稳定可再生能源以及通过现有的天然气网络解决H2运输安全性等。在电转甲烷过程中,CO2甲烷化反应具有强放热特性,因此如何实现电解制氢过程与甲烷化反应的热量耦合,已成为当前的研究热点之一。为评估不同电解制氢技术对电转甲烷过程的影响并探索不同电转甲烷技术路线的经济适用性,对高温电解(HTE)制氢与低温电解(LTE)制氢耦合CO2甲烷化的技术路线进行了能效与经济性的对比分析。结果表明,在基准计算参数下,HTE甲烷化路线的能量转化效率高于LTE甲烷化路线,并且经热回收后的HTE甲烷化路线具有更高的能量转化效率,最高可达85.8%。随着能量转化效率的提升,生产成本也得到了优化。尽管HTE甲烷化路线的成本(9.41 CNY/m3)高于LTE甲烷化(8.91 CNY/m3),但热回收后HTE甲烷化路线的成本降低至8.23 CNY/m3,相比LTE甲烷化路线具备一定的成本优势。敏感性因素分析表明,电价是影响生产成本的关键因素。为明确各技术路线的经济适用性边界,进一步探讨了电价变化对其成本影响的关键节点。结果显示,当电价低于0.24 CNY/kWh时,LTE甲烷化路线表现出明显的成本优势,而当电价高于0.24 CNY/kWh时热回收后的HTE甲烷化路线则展现出更好的经济性。随着碳交易体系不断完善,电转甲烷这类减碳技术不仅能降低碳排放,还能通过碳市场交易将环保效益转化为实际经济收入。当碳价超过350 CNY/t时,经热回收后的HTE甲烷化路线可与煤制天然气的经济性水平相当。

       

      Abstract: Power-to-Methane (PtM) technology presents many advantages, including the reduction of CO2 emissions, the storage of intermittent renewable energy, and the use of existing natural gas infrastructure to address the safety challenges of H2 transportation. The CO2 methanation reaction of the PtM process is strongly exothermic, so how to realize the heat coupling between the hydrogen production by electrolysis and the CO2 methanation reaction has become one of the current research hotspots. In order to assess the impact of different electrolytic hydrogen production technologies on the PtM process and to explore the applicability of different PtM technology routes, a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency and economic viability of coupling High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) and Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE) with CO2 methanation was carried out. The results indicate that under baseline calculation parameters, the energy conversion efficiency of the HTE methanation route is higher than that of the LTE methanation route. Furthermore, after heat recovery, the HTE methanation route achieves an even higher energy conversion efficiency of up to 85.8%. As energy efficiency improves, costs are optimized. Although the cost of the HTE methanation route (9.41 CNY/m3) is higher than that of the LTE methanation (8.91 CNY/m3), the cost of the HTE methanation route is reduced to 8.23 CNY/m3 after heat recovery, which provides a certain cost advantage over the LTE methanation route. The sensitivity analysis shows that the electricity price is the key factor affecting the production cost. In order to clarify the economic applicability boundary of each technology route, the key point for the impact of electricity price changes on costs was further investigated.The results show that when the electricity price is lower than 0.24 CNY/kWh, the LTE methanation route exhibits a clear cost advantage, while the HTE methanation route with heat recovery demonstrates better economics when the electricity price is higher than 0.24 CNY/kWh. With the continuous improvement of the carbon trading system, carbon reduction technologies such as PtM technologies not only reduce carbon emissions, but also convert environmental benefits into tangible economic gains through carbon market transactions. When the carbon price exceeds 350 CNY/t, the economics of HTE methanation route with heat recovery can be comparable to the coal-based natural gas production.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回